[NOTE: Portions of this piece previously appeared at Mid-Level Exceptional]

Article VII, Section 6 (c) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement details the Disabled Player Exception.

While the Disabled Player Exception takes many characteristics of other exceptions under the Collective Bargaining Agreement, it has a few unusual and legitimately interesting nuances that make it stand out.

How the Disabled Player Exception Works

Applying for the Disabled Player Exception

The DPE stands out among the CBA exceptions because teams have to apply for it, leading to one of the more interesting processes in the league. As specified by Article VII, Section 6(c)(4), after a submitted application a doctor designated by the NBA evaluates the relevant medical information and the player himself should the doctor want that. Like other medical evaluations, the player in question must participate and be truthful.

The standard for granting the exception specified by Section 6(c)(2) is “any injury or illness that, in the opinion of the physician described in Section 6(c)(4) below, makes it substantially more likely than not that the player would be unable to play through the following June 15.”

If the NBA-appointed doctor determines it is substantially more likely than not the player will be unable to play through the following June 15, the team gets the exception.

However, if the doctor rejects the application for the DPE, the Player’s Association can appeal. If that occurs, the case goes to the “neutral physician” which is a truly great title. At the beginning of each league year, the NBA and NBPA agree on a doctor for this purpose. The neutral physician has the same criteria and their determination is final, binding and unappealable.

The other reason the DPE can get really interesting is the difference in standard and application here. “Substantially more likely than not” does not mean the doctor has ruled the player out conclusively. In fact, the rules governing the exception specifically talk about the player’s potential return that season in 6(c)(6) discussed above. 

The Purpose of the Disabled Player Exception

Having a Disabled Player Exception helps take a little bit of the sting off of losing one of a team’s most important players. Tying the amount to the injured player’s salary means that many players cannot be adequately replaced (especially those on rookie contracts) and making the maximum amount of the exception the Non-Taxpayer MLE means that the single addition probably will not be a major player now and that will only become more true as the cap outgrows the Mid-Level Exception with the increased revenue in the new TV deal.

That said, it can be a small piece to help a team out in a bad situation. Having such a strong system in place to evaluate the injured player also makes it significantly harder for a team to attempt to game the system by getting a useful exception for an expensive player not carrying his weight, which would certainly be tempting for teams otherwise.

The DPE balances the pressure to keep competitive teams that have shown a willingness to spend above water with safeguards that make it very hard to exploit.

Example of the Disabled Player Exception: Martell Webster

Since the Washington Wizards’ application for a Disabled Player Exception on Martell Webster was approved, we know exactly what they will have to work with.

The lesser of the Non-Taypayer Mid-Level Exception and half of Webster’s salary for the 2015-16 season means that the Wizards will have an exception worth exactly $2,806,750. They can use that exception to trade for a single player in the last year of his contract (no options!), sign a single free agent on a one year deal, or claim a qualifying player off waivers.