Dec 17, 2014 2:40 PM EST
Sometimes, Nicolas Batum senses irritation within people expecting more than his passive offensive game, his penchant to involve teammates and orchestrate scores with vision and rebounding. He never grew up taught to score in the volume of the Michael Jordans and Kobe Bryants, instead idolizing Scottie Pippen and becoming inspired by a statistical line: 17 points, 10 rebounds, seven assists. This was the drive, Batum’s idea of a most balanced basketball player.
Every summer, his old French buddies return to their native country for the national team’s training camp and words of the practices in San Antonio, of the culture and free-flowing system, fascinate Batum. Tony Parker, Boris Diaw and San Antonio gave Batum and the Portland Trail Blazers a clinic in the Western Conference semifinal playoff series last season, and Batum pondered how he could play for those Spurs amid all the connected passes for wide-open shots, all the cuts and drives born of the sport’s fundamentals.
As Batum thought aloud, “Yeah, maybe I could. Maybe.”
Batum wasn’t looking outside Portland, but rather gauged his fit on a champion, any title winner, really. The Spurs showed the Blazers how basketball should be played, Batum says, and now Portland has started the season more cohesive, more potent. Away from Parker, away from co-stars in LaMarcus Aldridge and Damian Lillard, Batum learned the responsibilities of a leading scorer with the French team over the summer, a task Diaw bestowed upon him. Your team, your time.
And so Batum went for 35 and 27 points in the final two games of the World Cup to give France the bronze medal, and he noticed his Portland teammates urging him in training camp: Shoot, Nic. Shoot.
“I try to do everything on the court, but I know I got to be more aggressive,” Batum told RealGM. “The team needs it. Everybody’s pushing me here. When Tony Parker didn’t play with us this summer, Boris Diaw and I had to step up our games. That was a cool learning experience for me. Here, we’re all young and I would like to be the guy for LaMarcus and Damian. I would like that a lot. But I know I need to be aggressive, and it is coming.”
The Blazers believe their internal improvements along with the offseason’s bench additions will bring an elevated level of play in the postseason, but Batum has the ability to expedite the process, skills to alleviate droughts that their offense suffers at times. In his mind, Batum knows he must shoot more than eight-to-nine attempts a game, triggering significant drops in his shooting percentages and scoring outputs this season.
Even so, Batum still hasn’t fully recovered from a right knee injury troubling him from the outset of the season. He won’t blame his play with France for the wear and tear over the summer, a run further cementing his determination for the game, but regaining full strength in the knee is an ongoing process.
“I’m working on the knee, working to get it back to 100 percent,” Batum said. “It isn’t yet and it has bothered me a little bit, but it is coming along. I’ll get it right. But this is my game. I’ve always tried to do it all on the court. I never really was a scorer when I was young. Never had 25 points, 30 points per game. Growing up, I was always around 17, 10 and seven.
“That’s what I love to do, play both sides. Scottie Pippen was my favorite player, and I grew up watching him and always wanting to follow him.”
He has elevated the facilitating, the wing defense for the Blazers for seven seasons now, and scouts around the NBA agree: Batum has a mentality playing to score, not scoring to play. There’s no ideology of: let me score and then start to function other facets of the game. From Terry Stotts and his coaching staff to the veterans, Batum has been implored to score, to shoot, but he’ll forever defend and play for the best shots even when they aren’t coming his way.
Batum looks around the league, hears everyone already discussing the free agency of Kevin Durant. They’ll both fall in 2016, yet Batum believes he and Durant are made of the same disposition with different external temperaments. Durant’s been swarmed with questions about his future with the Oklahoma City Thunder. For Batum, the case is simple: Why leave Portland?
“I still have time and I like low key so there’s no reason to think yet, but why not stay in Portland?” Batum told RealGM. “I’ve been here for seven years now, so why not?”
His longtime friends came into a second-round series a season ago and showed the sport at its peak, and Batum left the matchup believing he could fit on a champion one day. In so many ways, he is a classic Spur: Passing, cutting, playing for the optimal score. Still, Portland needs to reach another level to supplant the West’s top contenders, relying upon Batum to tap into the next tier in his skill.
All around the Blazers, they’re pushing Nicolas Batum to be more assertive, to find the next echelon, and he promises one thing on his health and his game. “It’s coming.”
Dec 17, 2014 4:19 PM EST
The period between now and the NBA trade deadline on February 19 is one of unusual importance for Danny Ainge and the Boston Celtics. The Celtics are being rebuilt, so marshalling assets, managing the salary cap, and accruing young talent and future no. 1 picks is the name of the game. Some believe Ainge should use some of these assets to grab a quality veteran and make a play for the playoffs. My belief is Ainge is playing the long game, and is willing to be patient to get the talent necessary to be a legitimate contender. That means getting a genuine superstar by hook or by crook.
For that reason, I see the Celtics as sellers above all else. Ainge therefore faces some critical decisions before February 19th, in particular with four players who can become unrestricted free agents in July.
If Ainge does not think the four players are part of the team’s future, it is in his interest to trade them, ideally for expiring contracts and young prospects or, better yet, future draft choices. There is no reason to keep them the balance of the season, taking time away from players Ainge regards as part of the team’s future.
Two of the four players with expiring deals are Brandon Bass and Marcus Thornton. These are both solid rotation-caliber players in their prime, but it is unclear if there is much of a market for them. If Ainge can move either of them they are as probably as good as gone. Dream scenario in both cases: the Celtics move each of them along with one or two of the no. 2 choices they have stockpiled for expiring contracts and a future protected no. 1 draft choice. One could see a team like Miami needing Bass or Toronto needing Thornton, due to injuries.
Ainge has proven very adept at locating these types of deals—Tyler Zeller, anyone?—so if there is a market out there Ainge will find it...or create it.
Jeff Green is next. He has a year remaining on his contract but can opt out in July and it seems likely that he will. Green is having a good year and is a legitimate starting 3 in the NBA. At age 28 he probably has a good four quality seasons still in the tank. Were he under contract at his current $9.2 per annum for another four years I suspect Ainge would be happy to have him on board.
But it is another matter to sign a new contract for four or five years at what may well be more like Rudy Gay or Chandler Parsons money, say $13-15 million per annum. The league has grown short of quality 3s, so Green may even do better than that on the open market. In that case Green is swallowing up a lot of space under the salary cap. For a guy who is never likely to be more than the fourth best player on a genuine contender, he may be a luxury the Celtics cannot afford. Better to move him to a team that could use him right now—Toronto and Memphis both come to mind, and there are others—in exchange for expiring deals and one or two future no. 1 picks.
In the short term the Celtics have Evan Turner to play the 3 and they can work James Young into the rotation by the end of the year. The whole idea the rest of the season should be to give as much of the playing time as possible to players who might be part of the future.
Finally, there is the main attraction, the Celtics' best player, Rajon Rondo. What Ainge does with him by February 19 is the single great and defining issue before the team. I believe the Celtics came into the season with the hope that Rondo would play his best season to date and make the prospect of giving him a massive extension a no-brainer. Were that the case, an article on the Celtics in the trade market would not include Rondo. But instead Rondo’s season to date has been a disappointment. The Celtics must be having second thoughts about whether they want to sign him to a huge deal, one which would markedly reduce any possibility of entering the free agent market in a serious manner for the visible future.
So how is Rondo a disappointment? He remains the best passing point guard in the game, and in the first tier of best passers in NBA history. There are very few who are his equal. It is sheer pleasure to watch him make passes almost every game that no one else can make.
He is also an exceptional rebounder, perhaps the greatest 6-1 rebounder in NBA history.
That is one hell of a foundation for an NBA player, and all of this was evident with Rondo by his third season in the league, at age 23, when he destroyed the Bulls in the 2009 playoffs. Or in 2010 when he outplayed Dwight Howard and LeBron James in the playoffs and led the Celtics to the 7th game of the NBA Finals.
He was also an annual all-defense team player in those days.
But despite those virtues, Rondo was still an unfinished product. As great as he was in the playoffs in 2009 and 2010, he also disappeared and was largely ineffectual for many games. To become a genuine superstar, Rondo had to develop in two areas. First, he had to use his spectacular handle and quickness and savvy to initiate contact, draw fouls and get to the free throw line, in classic point guard style. Former coach Doc Rivers put it bluntly early in Rondo’s career when he said that if Rondo got to the line 10 times per game, he would be one of the all-time greats. Basically that is what Tiny Archibald did. Before injuries ravaged him, Archibald was a perennial league leader in scoring based on a good 10 trips to the line per game in the early-mid 1970s.
Second, Rondo had to be able to bury open jump shots, and eventually become a passable, even solid, three-point shooter when left wide open.
Both of these were realistic goals. It is what most great point guards have to do when they enter the league, from Magic Johnson to John Wall.
If Rondo had mastered one of those two areas, he would be a top 10-12 player in the league, and arguably capable of being the best player on a championship team.
If Rondo had mastered both of those areas, he would be a top-5 player and in the annual debate over league MVP. He arguably would be the third best player in Celtics history.
In either scenario, Rondo gets a five-year max contract offer from the Celtics this summer. The Celtics only pray that he accepts it.
Ray Allen once commented how he and Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce would watch Rondo routinely do amazing offensive moves in practice and want to say to him, “Dude, do you realize how good you could be?” Most Celtics fans have thought the same as they watched Rondo’s periodic dazzling, even breathtaking, performances, typified by his penchant for “triple doubles.” What if he rounded out his game like nearly all other great point guards and became a scoring threat?
Alas, it has not come to pass. Indeed Rondo has regressed. Rondo has always been dreadful at getting to the line and making free throws compared to other NBA point guards, but his career high 3.7 free throw attempts per 36 minutes in 2010 now looks like Moses Malone on steroids. This season Rondo is getting to the line at a career-low 1.9 times per 36 minutes, well below any other starting point guard.
And that doesn’t even begin to plumb the depths Rondo is exploring: In his rookie season of 2006-07, Rondo made a career-high 64.7 percent of his free throw attempts. That is a reasonable figure for a rookie and one would think that like many great guards he would see it climb towards 75 or even 80 percent as his career progressed. Instead, this season Rondo is only making 33 percent of the free throw attempts those extraordinarily rare times he does get to the line. No other player in NBA history playing 31.8 minutes per game—which is what Rondo is playing this season—has ever shot this low of a percentage. Only six NBA players who averaged more than 10 minutes-per-game and played at least 68 games in a season ever shot free throws this poorly—and the list is entirely comprised of notorious big man bricklayers like Andris Biedrins, Larry Smith, and Olden Polynice. Shaq’s worst year at the line looks like Larry Bird in his prime by comparison.
To put it another way, prior to this season, in the entire 69 year history of the NBA, not a single player who played 31.8 minutes per game has ever made as few free throws as Rondo is making this season. For a point guard, not to mention a superstar, this production is a farce.
At this point, Rondo appears to refuse to initiate contact and draw fouls because he is petrified of bricking free throws. It means he has taken a major weapon he needs to be an effective player out of his arsenal. That makes it much easier for teams to defend the Celtics.
Rondo’s aversion to getting to the line could be mitigated to a significant extent if he developed into a reliable shooter when left wide open. Jason Kidd had a similar game to Rondo’s when he came into the league, and Kidd never did develop much of a taste for getting to the line, usually only making 4 or 5 trips to the line per game even at his peak. After he turned 30, like most star players, Kidd stopped going to the line as much and was full Rondo by the time of his superb late-career stint with Dallas. But Kidd compensated for his free throw attempt inadequacy by becoming a solid shooter, especially from three-point land.
A better example is Steve Nash, who only once in his storied career ever averaged as many as four free throw attempts per game. He simply did not draw fouls. But Nash became a dead-eye shooter, especially from long distance. And, like Kidd, when he did get to the line, he made his free throws.
It looked like this might be Rondo’s pattern as well. When he returned from his ACL operation early in 2014 he seemed to shoot with more authority if not a great deal more success. But this season has been regression as he is shooting only half the number of three-pointers per 36 minutes as a year ago, and at a lower percentage, just 24 percent . It just isn’t happening. He is not better at shooting today than he was early in his career.
For Rondo this offensive incompetence translates into the lowest scoring average of career per 36 minutes—9.1 points per game—around 40 percent lower than his scoring average per 36 minutes in his peak years. And this is when the Celtics do not have Paul Pierce or Ray Allen or Kevin Garnett; the team desperately needs him to score to succeed and he isn’t doing it.
For a guy about to turn 29 and pretty much at the age where he should be peaking, this is disconcerting. Especially so since this is his contract year. If Rondo can’t get it together now, when he as much as $100 million on the line, it defies credulity to imagine he is going to suddenly get it together when the ink has dried and he is in his 30s. Just as likely, what you see now is what you are going to get.
And this Rondo can be a fine complementary piece, but he cannot be the best player on championship team, or, with the regression, the second best player on a championship team.
For these reasons I can imagine that Ainge is hesitant about building the next five years of the Celtics around Rondo. For the Celtics to be genuine contenders the team needs to get at least one player that will be a superstar and better than anyone they have at present. It will also require Ainge to draft well the next two or three years and for Brad Stevens to “coach up” players like Smart, Young, Olynyk and Sullinger. And it will take luck. The odds of getting lucky go down if there is little capspace to play with. With capspace, young players, and oodles of future no. 1 picks, Ainge has a vast array of resources to use to draft, trade for, or sign in free agency a prospective superstar.
It might be better to clear capspace—letting these four players go would put the Celtics very far below the salary cap immediately. In the short term the team is obviously weaker—but then the no. 1 pick is higher in 2015!—but the possibility for getting back to the very top improve.
Now even if Ainge decides that the Celtics cannot afford to give Rondo a max deal and decides to trade him before the deadline, that does not mean he can find much of a deal. Other GMs see what is going on and they are unlikely to want to pay much for half a season of Rondo. His market value has dropped. And this is a golden age for great point guards in the NBA; no one would place Rondo in the top 5 and not many in the top 10. He is a middle-of-the-pack player at this point.
The sort of place where Rondo would be a perfect fit is Houston. The Rockets have a superstar scorer in James Howard and a backline defender in Dwight Howard. Rondo would be able to neutralize the truly great point guards the Rockets will likely encounter in every round of the Western Conference playoffs—Chris Paul, Stephen Curry, Mike Conley, Russell Westbrook, Tony Parker, or Damian Lillard. He could make Houston absurdly unstoppable on offense. Houston is one team where Rondo could be the difference between an NBA title and a first or second round exit. With two superstars in their prime, there is no tomorrow for the Rockets. The supporting cast would cover Rondo’s flaws, much like the Big Three did in the Celtics recent glory days.
But it takes two to tango and other teams, including Houston, may be unwilling to give much of value for Rondo. It may get so low that it is just as well for Ainge to keep him, and let Stevens have an experienced floor general to develop the young players over the course of the season. Then just let Rondo walk come July. Sometimes teams are better off just letting players leave in free agency. Ask Atlanta if they miss Josh Smith or the Bulls if they missed Ben Gordon.
And then again, there is the possible outcome that the Celtics re-sign Rondo in the summer of 2015 at a much lower rate than anyone thought possible just a few months ago.
Recent reports have indicated Danny Ainge is burning up the phone lines in his trade negotiations with GMs across the league. This is his playoffs, and what he does before February 19th may prove to be decisive for determining the future of the franchise. Who wouldn’t love to be a fly on the wall in Celtics headquarters?
Dec 15, 2014 5:29 PM EST
After the wins against two of the worst teams in the Eastern Conference (Charlotte and Philadelphia), the Brooklyn Nets are back to within striking distance of .500. When you look at names on the Nets roster -- Deron Williams, Brook Lopez, Joe Johnson, etc -- there seems like there should be more to this team than we’re currently seeing. Age and injuries have robbed those names of their peak effectiveness, likely dooming Brooklyn to an early playoff exit, but tenuously hanging onto the last playoff spot in a watered down conference seems like an underachievement.
The Memphis teams coached by Lionel Hollins were above all things feisty and unrelenting (though that was helped by the presence of Tony Allen and Zach Randolph). They may not have had the talent to win a playoff series, but those Grizzlies would give their opponents hell. This Nets team, on the other hand, seems destined to be steamrolled by one of the top teams in the Eastern Conference come mid-April.
So is this middling squad what Brooklyn really is? Or can they find a panacea -- via trades or internal adjustments -- to regain their competitive footing?
Any dive into solutions for the Nets requires a quick look at their core problems. So let’s hit the big ones.
Outside of Mason Plumlee, this roster has exactly zero rotation regulars that could be described as even an “above-average” athlete for their position, by NBA standards of course. Particularly problematic is the backcourt combination of Williams, Johnson and rookie Bojan Bogdanovic. Of all three-man lineups that have played at least 250 minutes for Brooklyn, that trio posted a defensive rating of 106.7, the worst mark on the team, per NBA.com’s stats site. When Johnson, at 33 years old, is the de facto “stopper” of that group, it’s not hard to see why that’s the case. The frontcourt isn’t much better as Plumlee, whose awareness has yet to match his physical ability, is joined by a 38-year-old Garnett, the massive but immobile Lopez and Euro import, Mirza Teletovic.
Especially when watching live, you can see the impact long, athletic players have on NBA games. Sound positional defenders certainly have their place, but having long-limbed, agents of chaos is a must if you want to make opposing offenses uncomfortable. Surviving without any isn’t impossible (just as having them doesn’t guarantee success), but it certainly raises the level of difficulty.
Brooklyn currently ranks 19th in the league in 3-point percentage. And that number is helped by Johnson’s recent 6-of-11 stretch from deep against the Bobcats and Sixers. The Nets also rank just 20th in overall attempts, according to RealGM’s database. For a team that employs several players whose career averages hover well above league-average, both marks are disappointing.
The low percentage can be traced back to a number of culprits. Teletovic is shooting just 33.7 percent, four percentage points below his career mark, on over five attempts per game. Jarrett Jack, whose career 3-point percentage is 35.3, is 3-of-23 this season. Bogdanovic, billed as a lights-out shooter, also struggled to adjust to NBA line and is converting just 34.5 percent of his 3’s -- though he’s been coming around of late.
As I explored last year, the injury to Lopez allowed the Nets to both fit together and find a more cohesive identity offensively. With Lopez back, Paul Pierce and Shaun Livingston gone and a few new faces like Jack and Bogdanovic in the fold, Brooklyn just does things under Hollins. Other than playing slow and posting Lopez (when he’s playing), there’s no real clear sense of direction, which is probably why the team is ranked 23rd in offensive rating.
The other problem is that Hollins prefers bigs that can post up, but only Lopez really fits that mold. Plumlee is at his best as a dive-man in pick-and-rolls, and Teletovic and Garnett (sadly) are most effective as floor-spacers. Posting wings, like Johnson, also gets tricky when you have two bigs -- like Lopez and Garnett -- who can’t pull defenders out to the 3-point line. The spacing gets too tricky. On top of all this, it’s been hard to make out what type of player Williams is exactly right now. He barely posts up (more on that later) and lacks the explosion and ability to be the same dynamic threat to attack the rim that he was early on in his career. It all adds up to a slightly muddled hierarchy on the offensive end.
The Fix - Internal Solutions
1. The Rotation
The number one priority for Hollins should be to find an athletic presence to put into the starting lineup. Recently, Hollins has chosen to go with Sergey Karasev in lieu of Bogdanovic in an effort to shake up the starting backcourt. But swapping those two doesn’t dramatically upgrade the Nets in any meaningful way. With the trade of Jorge Gutierrez to Philly, the only real option available to Hollins is Markel Brown, a long, athletic, undersized two-guard lacking a reputation as a defender. Brown was far more focused on the offensive end of the floor in college, but with strong veterans in the locker room (especially Garnett), Hollins might be well served to give the former Oklahoma State product an extended look and see if Brown can grow into the role of a high-energy defender.
Brown is only listed at 6’3”, but has a 6’8” wing span and might be able to guard all three backcourt positions, depending on the personnel. Being able to have Brown concentrate his energy on tracking an opponents best offensive threat while hiding Johnson and/or Williams on a less threatening player could help boost the production of both. The problem for the Nets is that Brown is far from a polished offensive player and in particular seems to be far away from threatening opponents from 3.
The Nets could also consider reconfiguring their starting frontcourt as well. Cory Jefferson definitely fits the athlete mold, but when Garnett, Lopez, Plumlee and Teletovic are all healthy, there’s just not a place for the rookie from Arizona -- though Jefferson is natural pick to fill out the frontcourt rotation when the team is dealing with injuries or rest situations. So when dealing with their full complement of players, the Nets could try something a little drastic -- move Lopez to the bench.
Not only would this move help create a built-in minutes limitations for a player that has struggled with injuries throughout his career, but it would help alleviate the “touches” problem plaguing the current starting lineup. Hollins could start Plumlee in Lopez’s place, pairing him with Garnett, Brown, Johnson and Williams and creating a starting unit that should be much more competitive defensively. They’d have to change their approach offensively (we’ll get to that in a second) but the Nets should be much improved defensively.
2. The Offense
Swapping Plumlee and Lopez would be a way to trigger another huge need for the Nets -- shooting more 3’s. While trying to grow Plumlee’s game offensively is admirable and best for his long-term value, it’s not a good fit for an older team to win now. Plumlee is at his best rolling to the basket out of pick-and-rolls -- a good way to create open shots from 3 for a team struggling to generate them. Letting Johnson, Williams, and even Brown, engage in pick-and-roll heavy sets would be a great way to suck in the defense and open up more opportunities to bomb away from deep. It would also allow the Nets to find more post ups for both Johnson and Williams when the starters play together, since banishing Lopez to the role of offensive rebounder wouldn’t suit his skill set like it does Plumlee.
The bench unit, one that has struggled due to the lack of consist threat to breakdown defenses, could then play through Lopez in the post. Bogdanovic and Teletovic could then station themselves on the arc, bombing away from 3 as Lopez attacks second-unit bigs. Defensively, this group would be vulnerable, but the beauty of playing them against other reserves is there is a less likely chance they can be exposed in a major way. Plus in the games Garnett misses, Teletovic can slide into the starting lineup and Jefferson can pair with Lopez off the bench and use his athleticism and activity to muck up opponent possessions.
It’s hard to gauge what the Nets could do on the trade market because the value of Lopez, Williams and Johnson are all rather obscure. Johnson has value to teams on the edge of title contention as a veteran scorer that can push them to a new level. The problem, as always, is his massive contract. Very few contending teams can match up salaries in order to swing a deal for Johnson, meaning it’s very unlikely he departs Brooklyn. Williams is probably more moveable, but he’s been far from the problem for the Nets. It seems like a trade including Williams is likely just a lateral “shake up” type deal that just switches up parts before ultimately leaving Brooklyn where they are now.
That leaves Lopez. It’s hard a team willing to risk his injury history that resides in the Western Conference -- where the Nets would likely prefer to send him. Oklahoma City makes sense, but any combination of unproven youth and Kendrick Perkins’ expiring deal doesn’t seem like great value for a big like Lopez, unless the Nets view his departure as addition by subtraction.
Dec 08, 2014
On defending the pick-and-pop with a 'show-and-over' strategy, along with the Nuggets not using Arron Afflalo's postgame to increase their offensive efficiency.
Dec 06, 2014
Greg Monroe never wanted to return to the Pistons, but Stan Van Gundy wanted a chance to make it work with their trio of big men while risking losing Monroe for nothing in 2015.
Dec 01, 2014
Gerald Green, Monta Ellis, Lou Williams and Amir Johnson were part of the final high school class to go straight to the NBA. Talent was never the issue for any of these guys, but it took them awhile to find their place as they were caught between two eras.
Nov 25, 2014
While the Warriors' front office should be thrilled with Klay Thompson’s strong play and the team looking dominant early in the season, the rationale for making the Kevin Love trade still stands.
Nov 24, 2014
From trying times to a contending team, Bradley Beal has been the perfect co-star for John Wall and these Wizards, fresh of talent and his own sense of self.
Nov 19, 2014
Anthony Davis is the NBA’s most incredible prodigy (possibly ever) despite a late development in which he almost left the game.
Nov 17, 2014
The Pistons seem to have enough talent to mould a playoff team if Stan Van Gundy pushes the right buttons. The early returns on Jonas Jerebko’s play in SVG's high-low system have been fantastic.
Nov 11, 2014
Just as Chip Kelly is rethinking the quarterback position, Erik Spoelstra has kept enough components of his system on offense to withstand losing LeBron James.
Nov 10, 2014
How the Suns replaced floor spacing and passing with more scoring by letting Channing Frye and Ish Smith leave and adjusting to that, while the Celtics tried to stop the Mavs by letting Monta Ellis shoot.
Nov 08, 2014
Solomon Hill played sparingly as a late first-round pick on a championship contender, but things changed very quickly this offseason.
Nov 03, 2014
The Wolves' roster is one of the few in the league that can be adjusted on a game-to-game basis to counter whatever the opposition throws at them, while we look at fouling up three.
Oct 30, 2014
The Thunder ran out of steam in the fourth quarter, but the first game of the Russell Westbrook experience was everything people hoped it would be. Westbrook is going to mount a full-fledged assault on the rest of the league and there’s no player more fun to watch in that scenario.
Oct 28, 2014
The Spurs, Clippers and Cavaliers enter the season as Tier One teams, while the Bulls, Raptors, Thunder, Warriors, Rockets and several other Western Conference teams are in that second tier.
Oct 27, 2014
The Cavs, 76ers, Spurs, Nuggets, Hornets and Suns were amongst teams to have a great offseason, while the Thunder, Magic, Kings, Lakers, Pacers and Knicks had bad ones.
Oct 24, 2014
Tobias Harris, Norris Cole, Cody Zeller, Otto Porter and Dennis Schroeder are five players in the Southeast Division that could offer their teams a boost by taking the next step in their development.
Oct 22, 2014
Before Lance Stephenson attended the Hornets' meeting and was handed team material on that July night in Las Vegas, pleas were made to find salary space and a shorter-term deal with the Pacers.
Oct 20, 2014
Andre Drummond, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Dion Waiters, Tony Snell and Solomon Hill are young players of the Central Division that can offer their teams improvement from within.
Older Articles »
Basketball Wiretap Headlines