With Andrew Wiggins joining Kansas, the Jayhawks should stay at the Top of the Big 12. But the projection for West Virginia, Kansas St., and Oklahoma is entirely different from last season. Read More. Written by Dan Hanner on May 19, 2013
Tyus Jones, the No. 2 overall recruit for 2014 and an excellent point guard, was selected by Paul Biancardi, Adam Finkelstein and John Stovall. Read More.
The event gives front offices the opportunity to evaluate D-League players with the possibility of offering Summer League or training camp invites. Read More.
Tyus Jones, the No. 2 overall recruit for 2014 and an excellent point guard, was selected by Paul Biancardi, Adam Finkelstein and John Stovall. Read More.
While my preseason projections won’t be available until the end of October, I have cranked out the odds for the holiday tournaments based on my rankings. Today’s column looks at who is likely to win each early season tournament, and what storylines to keep an eye on.
Do not hesitate to print out the tournament brackets and follow along as they happen. It is extremely easy to get busy with the Thanksgiving holidays and miss some of the best games of the season. But if you print out these brackets and fill them in, you won’t miss the upsets. Just click on the handy links throughout this document to find the printable brackets.
I’ve already expressed my doubts about Michigan and my faith in Pittsburgh. But Pitt’s second round opponent will be very dangerous. Both Lehigh (led by NCAA hero CJ McCollum) and Robert Morris (led by super-scorer Velton Jones) have the ability to knock off Pittsburgh. These teams have a real chance to win the Patriot League and Northeast Conference, and this is the type of game that can mean the difference between earning a 15 seed and a 13 seed come March.
OSU’s Jared Cunningham, Alabama’s JaMychal Green, Purdue’s Robbie Hummel, and Villanova’s Maalik Wayns are gone, and those players were not only their team’s leading scorers last season, they were the heart of their respective offenses. Which rebuilding team will forge a new identity first? Because Anthony Grant has become a dominant defensive coach, while Craig Robinson has not, Alabama is the favorite here.
There are some big name conference schools here, but this tournament is a dream for fans of mid-major squads. Murray St. won’t be able to duplicate last year’s 31-2 record, but with superstar point-guard Isaiah Canaan returning, Murray St. should have enough to beat Auburn and St. John’s. In fact, they might even face the College of Charleston in the semifinals. This offseason Charleston added head coach Doug Wojcik, a veteran coach who hasn’t been able to get to the NCAA tournament, but a coach who has consistently built strong defensive teams. If Wojcik can get Charleston to play great defense this season, he has enough returning talent to make a run at an NCAA tournament bid. Andrew Lawrence is clearly Charleston’s best returning offensive player, but the real player to keep an eye on is Adjehi Baru. Baru was ranked 37th in the nation out of high school and is one of the highest ranked recruits to ever attend Charleston. And while Baru was a nice complimentary player as a freshman last season, it will be very interesting to see if he can break out as a sophomore.
Of course the clear favorite here is Baylor. Baylor may have lost some key post players to graduation and the NBA, but they have plenty of incoming talent. This will be our first chance to see the highly acclaimed 7’1” freshman Isaiah Austin in action.
Oklahoma St.’s odds aren’t poor because Oklahoma St. is a bad team. The Cowboys add Top 10 freshman Marcus Smart alongside former Top 10 recruit LeBryan Nash. That one-two punch will make Oklahoma St. a likely NCAA tournament team this year. But the Cowboys have a terrible tournament draw. First Oklahoma St. has to face Akron. Akron point guard Alex Abreu may be under-sized, but he’s an extremely talented player, and 7 foot center Zeke Marshall could have played for a number of BCS teams. And while the MAC hasn’t had multiple NCAA bids since 1999, Ohio and Akron are strong enough to break that trend.
Meanwhile Tennessee is a heavy favorite to be the second round opponent. Tennessee may have only finished 19-15 last year, but the Vols played substantially better after Jarnell Stokes joined the team mid-season. And with Trae Golden and Jeronne Maymon becoming efficient scorers for head coach Cuonzo Martin, a lot of people have taken notice. Florida head coach Billy Donovan has gone on the record to say that Tennessee is the team to beat in the SEC this season.
And if Oklahoma St. wins that game, they only have to face NC State in the final, the same NC State team that many people have labeled as the ACC favorite. So no, Oklahoma St. isn’t a bad team. But their path to a Puerto Rico tipoff title is brutal.
If you get tired of the sloppy play by all the new players in November, please don’t miss Notre Dame vs St. Joseph’s in the first round of the Coaches vs Cancer tournament. Both teams return all five starters from last season and have plenty of offensive stars. I’m going to keep writing about the shot-blocking CJ Aiken, super-slasher Carl Jones, and the super-efficient Langston Galloway until St. Joe’s gets more love, but this four team field is wide open.
Notre Dame is the favorite, but I do have one question for Irish fans. Given Scott Martin’s middling efficiency numbers in his career, was it a good thing that the NCAA granted him an additional year of eligibility? Martin made just 26% of his threes and 40% of his twos last year, and while injuries may have contributed to that, it is clear he wasn’t an elite player last year.
Despite a host of mid-major schools, this tournament looks very dull. Mercer and Iona might compete for the ASun and MAAC titles this year, but neither looks like a likely at-large bid.
And still Connecticut’s tournament odds are not great. First NCAA tournament sanctions led to a host of transfers this off-season. Then the Huskies lost Jim Calhoun to retirement. And as we’ve seen in recent seasons, UConn has been a different team when Calhoun is out. He’s a special coach who can elevate the level of his players, and he will not easily be replaced.
Steve Alford’s team might actually be a little better on offense this season. The team loses Drew Gordon at the forward position, but New Mexico also loses AJ Hardeman. And as great an offensive player as Gordon was, Hardeman was a black hole on offense. With Alex Kirk returning from injury to provide that shot-blocking presence in the paint, and all the returning talent at the guard spots, New Mexico deserves more preseason praise.
Washington’s Abdul Gaddy has had an injury filled career, but with Tony Wroten leaving early for the draft, this is Gaddy’s team. The senior point-guard will have to integrate some new pieces throughout the Washington lineup. Seton Hall will have a number of new faces as well, including Georgia Tech transfer Brian Oliver and Southern Illinois transfer Gene Teague. Realistically, the winner of this game will probably be headed to the NIT, but a win against Ohio St. would be a fantastic notch on any NCAA resume. While Ohio St. is the clear favorite thanks to the efficient high volume shooter DeShaun Thomas, there are questions about how the Buckeyes offense will run without Jared Sullinger.
This first table recreates the Pomeroy rankings using only games against NCAA tournament teams:
Team
Adj Off
Adj Def
W
L
Pythag.
1
Michigan St.
117.6
84.8
12
5
0.9662
2
Missouri
127.7
93.4
11
3
0.9611
3
Kentucky
122.9
89.9
11
2
0.9609
4
Ohio St.
117.8
86.4
10
6
0.9599
5
Kansas
114.6
86.7
12
6
0.9459
6
Murray St.
117.9
90.2
4
0
0.9397
7
North Carolina
116.9
90.1
12
5
0.9355
8
Indiana
121.2
93.8
8
5
0.9322
9
Georgetown
115.1
89.1
8
6
0.9322
10
VCU
116.7
90.5
3
1
0.9312
11
Vanderbilt
117.2
91.4
6
5
0.9274
12
Wisconsin
112.0
87.6
7
7
0.9250
13
Syracuse
113.9
89.3
12
2
0.9242
14
Wichita St.
117.9
92.5
4
3
0.9229
15
Florida
121.7
96.0
5
6
0.9187
16
Michigan
114.8
91.3
7
7
0.9129
17
Florida St.
109.9
87.6
7
5
0.9114
18
Southern Miss
116.8
93.3
5
2
0.9090
19
Duke
119.3
95.4
10
5
0.9082
20
St. Louis
115.1
92.2
4
3
0.9074
- No one has performed better against NCAA tournament teams than Michigan St. While their winning percentage isn’t the best, when accounting for opponent, venue, and margin-of-victory, the Spartans have been the most dominant.
- While Syracuse has an impressive 12-2 record against tournament teams, the reality is that they haven’t been completely dominant in those games. They’ve escaped with close wins against Georgetown, Connecticut, West Virginia, and others.
- I’m not sure I would trust these numbers for teams with very few games. Sure VCU has great numbers, but they played Western Kentucky twice and crushed them, and they beat South Florida handily while the Bulls were missing multiple starters. Similarly, Murray St.’s impressive stats are driven by one blowout win over St. Mary’s.
- But for teams with numerous games against tournament teams, the stats are more revealing. Duke has played 15 games against NCAA teams and while they’ve gone 10-5, they haven’t exactly been blowing teams out.
- Ken Pomeroy has rightfully argued that Southern Miss is over-seeded. But the reason that happened is because the Golden Eagles have been at their best against quality competition.
Team
Adj Off
Adj Def
W
L
Pythag.
21
Louisville
106.2
85.1
11
8
0.9068
22
New Mexico
112.3
90.0
7
4
0.9059
23
Temple
118.0
95.0
5
2
0.9023
24
Colorado
103.4
83.5
2
3
0.8991
25
Marquette
111.9
90.5
9
6
0.8988
26
Kansas St.
111.6
90.3
6
8
0.8979
27
Baylor
119.4
96.7
10
7
0.8967
28
Gonzaga
110.8
90.2
5
4
0.8923
29
Cincinnati
111.8
93.1
7
6
0.8676
30
Alabama
106.4
88.6
4
6
0.8667
31
UNLV
112.3
93.7
5
6
0.8654
32
St. Mary's
118.6
98.9
4
3
0.8654
33
Ohio
110.8
92.5
2
1
0.8643
34
Texas
113.8
95.0
4
11
0.8640
35
Xavier
110.7
92.5
5
7
0.8625
36
Iowa St.
110.6
93.4
7
7
0.8497
37
Lehigh
123.6
104.8
0
2
0.8450
38
Virginia
104.6
88.7
2
6
0.8436
39
Belmont
113.3
96.4
0
2
0.8391
40
Creighton
121.0
103.2
3
1
0.8353
- No one has played more games against tournament teams than Louisville. And while the Cardinal haven’t always been dominant, they have been tested.
- Baylor may be a No. 3 seed, but they’ve struggled against NCAA tournament teams.
- Texas has been close in a lot of games, but the 4-11 record indicates that they’ve rarely earned the win against quality competition.
Team
Adj Off
Adj Def
W
L
Pythag.
41
Connecticut
111.3
95.1
7
8
0.8337
42
Davidson
116.0
99.8
1
3
0.8241
43
Purdue
117.6
101.4
3
10
0.8195
44
West Virginia
111.4
96.3
4
8
0.8160
45
San Diego St.
108.6
94.1
6
6
0.8130
46
Notre Dame
105.8
91.9
10
7
0.8086
47
Harvard
93.7
81.6
2
1
0.8047
48
Memphis
112.5
98.4
3
6
0.7981
49
Long Beach St.
112.1
98.2
1
7
0.7953
50
NC State
111.2
98.1
4
9
0.7838
51
Iona
112.6
100.6
3
2
0.7604
52
Montana
105.0
95.6
1
1
0.7252
53
St. Bonaventure
109.5
101.4
2
4
0.6878
54
New Mexico St.
100.6
93.3
1
3
0.6856
55
Detroit
93.8
87.8
0
2
0.6635
56
Loyola (MD)
104.9
99.3
1
3
0.6363
57
Norfolk St.
94.3
89.7
1
2
0.6252
58
Colorado St.
107.4
102.6
5
6
0.6136
59
BYU
104.1
100.1
1
6
0.5991
60
South Florida
92.4
91.6
3
10
0.5215
61
Vermont
101.2
100.5
0
5
0.5166
62
Lamar
95.5
94.9
0
4
0.5163
63
NC Asheville
102.0
102.2
0
4
0.4952
64
Long Island
101.5
103.7
1
2
0.4443
65
California
97.0
99.3
1
5
0.4412
66
Western Kentucky
97.5
102.2
0
4
0.3794
67
Mississippi Valley St.
91.5
96.5
0
5
0.3658
68
South Dakota St.
0
0
- South Florida hasn’t performed well against tournament teams, but play-in game opponent California has been even worse.
- Memphis has also earned its keep by crushing non-tournament teams. Against the tournament field they have been merely average.
- Amazingly, South Dakota St. did not play a single NCAA tournament team during the regular season.
Last 10 Games Splits
But how have these teams done in the last 10 games?
Team
Adj Off
Adj Def
W
L
Pythag.
1
Michigan St.
121.5
84.4
8
2
0.9767
2
Memphis
119.6
83.4
9
1
0.9757
3
Kentucky
123.2
89.1
9
1
0.9652
4
North Carolina
120.5
87.8
9
1
0.9623
5
Wichita St.
121.7
90.5
9
1
0.9542
6
Kansas
120.0
90.0
9
1
0.9505
7
Missouri
132.5
99.3
8
2
0.9504
8
Vanderbilt
119.8
90.0
7
3
0.9494
9
Ohio St.
119.1
90.4
6
4
0.9441
10
Indiana
122.5
93.2
8
2
0.9427
11
Syracuse
117.7
90.9
9
1
0.9336
12
Purdue
129.8
102.3
6
4
0.9201
13
Georgetown
111.7
88.2
6
4
0.9180
14
Baylor
120.1
94.9
6
4
0.9179
15
Wisconsin
115.7
92.1
6
4
0.9116
16
Belmont
117.8
94.3
10
0
0.9072
17
New Mexico
110.8
89.2
8
2
0.9021
18
South Florida
97.4
78.9
7
3
0.8965
19
St. Louis
108.1
87.7
8
2
0.8945
20
Kansas St.
111.2
90.5
6
4
0.8922
- Now Memphis becomes an even bigger dilemma. They’ve been playing like one of the top teams in the country lately, but when they played tournament teams, they weren’t nearly as good. Which team will show up on Friday?
- Belmont is currently clicking on all cylinders which makes them a trendy pick to upset Georgetown.
- And don’t sleep on South Florida. They were a much better team at the end of the season, even if they can’t score to save their life.
Team
Adj Off
Adj Def
W
L
Pythag.
21
Florida St.
111.8
91.2
8
2
0.8899
22
Marquette
114.1
93.1
7
3
0.8897
23
Michigan
115.7
94.5
7
3
0.8891
24
Duke
114.0
93.2
8
2
0.8878
25
Louisville
100.1
81.9
6
4
0.8873
26
Cincinnati
113.8
93.4
7
3
0.8836
27
Iowa St.
113.9
93.5
6
4
0.8834
28
St. Bonaventure
118.9
98.3
8
2
0.8753
29
Gonzaga
112.9
94.1
8
2
0.8658
30
Florida
121.1
101.9
4
6
0.8546
31
Long Beach St.
108.1
91.2
8
2
0.8507
32
New Mexico St.
110.9
93.7
8
2
0.8479
33
NC State
111.9
94.8
5
5
0.8458
34
Connecticut
112.6
96.0
5
5
0.8357
35
California
109.1
93.2
7
3
0.8342
36
Virginia
102.5
87.6
4
6
0.8332
37
Notre Dame
111.4
95.3
7
3
0.8316
38
Temple
115.8
99.1
8
2
0.8316
39
Alabama
103.6
89.0
6
4
0.8270
40
Colorado St.
113.1
97.3
6
4
0.8244
- Louisville really is the perfect analogy to last year’s UConn team. They limped to the finish in the regular season before winning the Big East tournament. Overall in the last 10, they haven’t been that great, but over the last 4 games they were special.
- Duke was simply not dominant over the teams last 10 games.
Team
Adj Off
Adj Def
W
L
Pythag.
41
Texas
113.9
98.5
6
4
0.8168
42
South Dakota St.
112.6
97.5
9
1
0.8129
43
San Diego St.
108.6
94.9
6
4
0.8004
44
VCU
107.0
94.1
9
1
0.7883
45
Ohio
109.1
96.3
8
2
0.7839
46
Montana
103.0
91.5
10
0
0.7702
47
Davidson
109.8
97.6
8
2
0.7696
48
Creighton
118.8
105.7
7
3
0.7675
49
Murray St.
105.9
94.4
9
1
0.7646
50
Xavier
108.1
96.6
6
4
0.7600
51
Harvard
108.1
97.1
8
2
0.7514
52
UNLV
104.2
93.7
5
5
0.7483
53
West Virginia
111.0
99.9
4
6
0.7471
54
Colorado
101.6
91.9
7
3
0.7355
55
Iona
121.1
109.6
8
2
0.7347
56
Lehigh
105.4
95.5
9
1
0.7328
57
St. Mary's
113.1
102.5
7
3
0.7321
58
Detroit
109.7
99.6
9
1
0.7287
59
Vermont
101.2
91.9
9
1
0.7277
60
BYU
101.5
92.7
7
3
0.7171
61
NC Asheville
106.2
98.1
8
2
0.6934
62
Lamar
105.6
98.9
7
3
0.6617
63
Southern Miss
107.3
104.2
5
5
0.5731
64
Western Kentucky
101.6
98.9
7
3
0.5693
65
Loyola (MD)
104.1
102.9
7
3
0.5281
66
Long Island
111.6
110.6
9
1
0.5236
67
Norfolk St.
97.9
103.6
9
1
0.3572
68
Mississippi Valley St.
93.8
108.3
9
1
0.1869
- As much as I love Texas based on all their close losses to quality teams, they sort of limped to the finish. They may have defeated Iowa St. in the Big 12 tournament, but before that they were struggling to beat teams like Texas Tech.
- Murray St. also struggled down the stretch in the OVC. They were winning games, but not by a margin that would suggest a deep NCAA tournament run.
Because of the fast pace of both teams, BYU versus Iona has the potential to be one of the most entertaining First Four games of all-time. Also, I am salivating at seeing Missouri’s guards and Florida’s guards potentially clashing in the round of 32. But before I start breaking down the bracket, let’s throw a few quick stats at the wall:
Which Conferences Did the Best?
One thing I like to track during the NCAA tournament is whether conferences are exceeding expectations or falling short. One way to do that is to look at how seeds have performed from 1985 to 2011 and predict an expected number of wins for each conference.
(Note: In all tables I am only counting wins in the Round of 64 and beyond.)
Seed
Expected Wins
1
3.37
2
2.43
3
1.86
4
1.47
5
1.19
6
1.19
7
0.82
8
0.69
9
0.58
10
0.65
11
0.54
12
0.52
13
0.25
14
0.17
15
0.04
16
0.00
Based on these seed expectations and the seeds received, the Big East should win the most games in the tournament, but the Big Ten is expected to win nearly as many games with three fewer teams.
Conference
Teams
EW
Big East
9
12.06
Big Ten
6
10.86
ACC
5
8.85
Big 12
6
8.64
SEC
4
5.96
MWC
4
4.11
A10
4
2.59
MVC
2
1.88
WCC
3
1.73
CUSA
2
1.27
Pac12
2
0.80
MAAC
2
0.13
Other
19
4.21
We can also use this year’s margin-of-victory numbers to form an expectation. In the next table I use Ken Pomeroy’s predicted probabilities. Here we get a slightly different picture. His model expects the Big Ten to win the most games in the tournament, with the ACC earning far fewer wins than their high seeds would indicate:
Conference
Teams
Pomeroy
Big Ten
6
12.03
Big 12
6
9.70
Big East
9
9.36
ACC
5
6.99
SEC
4
6.34
MWC
4
3.63
A10
4
2.67
MVC
2
2.30
WCC
3
1.56
CUSA
2
1.44
Pac12
2
1.13
MAAC
2
0.29
Other
19
5.55
Team-By-Team
2012 is the year of the clear favorite. It will be virtually impossible for any of the experts who follow college basketball not to pick Kentucky to win the national championship. In terms of the measured statistics like margin-of-victory, in terms of the NBA ready talent on the floor, in terms of 34 games on TV over four months, no one has come close to the Wildcats this season.
But more importantly, there are no clear alternatives to the Wildcats. Again using Ken Pomeroy’s formula, here are the expected wins for each team in the tournament this year:
Team
Seed
EW
Kentucky
1
3.38
Ohio St.
2
3.38
Michigan St.
1
2.80
Kansas
2
2.74
North Carolina
1
2.56
Missouri
2
2.47
Syracuse
1
2.25
Wisconsin
4
2.09
Duke
2
1.75
Rather than showing one clear alternative, the numbers show a great deal of balance between the top seeds.
The Right Side of the Bracket (East and Midwest)
The margin-of-victory crowd is going to love Ohio St., but they might be the only ones. Despite bringing back one of the top post players in the country in Jared Sullinger, one of the top defenders in Aaron Craft, one of the most prolific two-guards in William Buford, and watching Deshaun Thomas emerge into a versatile scoring threat, Ohio St.’s offense has struggled at times this year. Ohio St. has simply not been able to replace the outside shooting of Jon Diebler. And by sharing the Big Ten title and falling to Michigan St. in the conference tournament, very few people are going to be in love with this team. Add in a potential Sweet Sixteen match-up with a Florida St. team that has two wins against Duke and two wins against North Carolina, and Ohio St. will get far less love than these numbers would suggest.
Syracuse is the more traditional favorite, but they are the worst defensive rebounding team in the field, and their offense can look stagnant when they aren’t forcing turnovers. Even a second round match-up against Kansas St. could be a nightmare for Syracuse. Kansas St.’s team is built to crash the glass, and if Angel Rodriguez can simply throw up jump shots (instead of turning the ball over at his normally high rate), Kansas St. might have a chance for an upset.
North Carolina is the choice for people who like NBA talent, but the ACC was so weak this year, the Tar Heels didn’t get their normal share of big games. And when they did play quality teams, they would usually be close. UNC would win 54-51 against Virginia or 69-67 against NC State. Certainly everyone says North Carolina has a lot of NBA ready talent on paper, but unlike Kentucky, it never felt like North Carolina was unbeatable. Ever since the big win over Michigan St. on an aircraft carrier to start the season, they rarely gave off that aura of invincibility. And with John Henson’s injury this weekend, there are additional doubts about the Tar Heels.
If you are scared away by Kentucky’s inexperience, you might like Kansas. The Jayhawks don’t have any amazing freshmen this year because the majority of their recruiting class was declared academically ineligible to start the season. That has left Kansas with a veteran lineup and Bill Self has clearly got the most out of every player on the floor. The once ridiculed Tyshawn Taylor has emerged as a polished superstar and Thomas Robinson emerged into quite possibly the best player in the country.
But when you look at this group of four teams (Syracuse, Ohio St., North Carolina, and Kansas) any honest evaluation would say that it truly is a toss-up. I would unquestionably pick these four teams for the regional finals on that half of the bracket, but I have no idea which of these teams will play in the national title game.
The Left Side of the Bracket (West)
On the other side of the bracket, it is hard not to love what Michigan St. has accomplished this year. But the Spartans got the worst possible second round draw. Memphis has been absolutely demolishing teams lately, winning their last seven games by 18 points or more. Michigan St. may be able to exploit Memphis’ lack of size in the paint better than any team in the nation, but they shouldn’t have to face such a dominant team in the second round. (Oh, and if St. Louis upsets Memphis, they have elite margin-of-victory numbers too.) So even if Michigan St. was a reasonable pick for a deep run based on their performance in the toughest conference in the country this year, the bracket makes the Spartans a very risky bet.
Instead many people will be drawn to the sentimental favorite Missouri. Don’t pick against the Tigers because of their lack of depth. They’ve played smart and avoided foul trouble all year. Don’t pick against the Tigers because of their lack of size. They’ve played bigger teams all year, and they’ve actually struggled more against smaller quicker teams. In fact, I would argue that picking against Missouri is the most unpleasant thing you could possibly do this year. With only 7 scholarship players, this group has developed a type of offensive chemistry that will help you rediscover a love for basketball.
I think part of what made the Missouri offense so good this year was the change of pace. Normally when a player goes to the NBA they realize that the game is much faster. But eventually the game slows down. Well, Missouri is having a slow-down moment. While Missouri still plays at an exceedingly fast-pace relative to most teams, it is much slower than what they played under Mike Anderson. Somehow the game is very calm and controlled for them, while remaining at a fever pitch for opponents.
Ricardo Ratliffe is the perfect example. Teams know that he shoots nearly 70% in the paint so they cannot afford to let him get paint touches, but somehow the Missouri guards are always cutting and using screens and finding a way to get him the ball in scoring position. And Ratliffe probably has the quickest release of any post player in college today. He rarely holds the ball and lets the defense react. He catches the ball and gets it up on the backboard immediately
Having said all that, I’m not in love with Missouri’s draw. Let me get to that:
First, I really like Florida over Virginia. A number of the experts say that Virginia likes to play a pack-line defense and force teams to shoot over the top. Well, Florida is not afraid to shoot over the top. But I actually think that is a little over-rated. Virginia has played the pack-line defense, but still been quick enough to get out on shooters. What concerns me more than anything is how poorly Virginia has played since Assane Sene has gone down. The defense just hasn’t been the same without the 7 footer in the middle, and he is not going to be back for the tournament.
And if Florida advances to face Missouri, that’s a dream match-up on paper. While Missouri has succeeded by playing four guards around Ricardo Ratliffe, that will allow Florida to play four guards around Patric Young. And while Kentucky has almost single-handedly convinced the country that Florida isn’t very good, realistically Florida is almost the mirror-image of Missouri. Missouri might be the favorite, but that game would be very close to a toss-up.
And if Missouri faces Marquette in the Sweet Sixteen, Marquette is another team that has the quickness to stay with Missouri. Plus Buzz Williams clearly takes his scouting to another level in the NCAA tournament. Facing his team after a four day break would be a nightmare.
The Left Side of the Bracket (South)
Duke drew the short straw getting placed in the same region as Kentucky. And the Blue Devils were also clearly the least dominant of the 1 and 2 seeds during the regular season. Give Mike Krzyzewski credit for putting together the right non-conference schedule that got Duke the quality wins they need to be a 2-seed, but even the usually Duke-loving Dick Vitale has said that this is not a vintage Duke team. When Vitale says the Blue Devils might lose in the second round of the tournament, you know they have flaws. Now is probably a good time for me to show another Expected Win chart:
Team
Seed
EW
Baylor
3
1.73
Wichita St.
5
1.61
Marquette
3
1.51
Indiana
4
1.48
Georgetown
3
1.36
New Mexico
5
1.34
Michigan
4
1.33
Louisville
4
1.24
Florida St.
3
1.19
Vanderbilt
5
1.17
Baylor will be the clear pick to upset Duke for some people based on the large amount of NBA talent on their roster. But as an NBA-centered team, they remind me a lot of recent Texas teams under Rick Barnes. Somehow showing off their game for NBA scouts is more important than winning. Baylor proved some skeptics wrong by beating Kansas in the Big 12 tournament, but if Missouri will make you love college basketball, cheering for Baylor will absolutely drive you nuts. You almost have to beg for Perry Jones III to get a post touch, and while Brady Heslip is a great sharp-shooter, he doesn’t seem to have any feel for when to take threes and when to work the offense.
Dark Horses
- I’ve already written at length about how Wisconsin’s numbers are inflated based on crushing a bunch of small teams early in the season. But I do believe the Badgers are dangerous. My main concern with picking them is that at their slow pace, they open up the door to losing any game. Montana is clearly not in Wisconsin’s league, but in a 58 possession game, against a solid Montana defense, the game will probably be close.
- Wichita St. is the most dominant MVC team since Ken Pomeroy began tracking stats, and they have the kind of 7-foot center in Garrett Stutz that a lot of mid-major teams do not. That is why Seth Davis was professing his love for this team on CBS.
- Vanderbilt absolutely has the talent at every position to beat any team in the country. And they should long savor their win over Kentucky in the SEC final. But the main complaint is that the Commodores have failed to play well against weaker teams. With basically the same lineup they’ve lost in the first round of the NCAA tournament in previous years, and they had many games this season where they struggled with weaker opponents. Sure, I’ll believe you if you say they can beat Syracuse. But can they even get to that game?
- Finally, Florida St. is the team that a lot of people are going to be picking based on the ACC tournament title. But again, they have a potential nightmare match-up if they face Cincinnati. The Bearcats are one of the best teams in the country at forcing steals and Florida St.’s biggest weakness is holding on to the ball. Sure, they might be able to beat Ohio St. But can they even get to that game?
Here are more expected wins in the round of 64 and beyond:
Team
Seed
EW
Kansas St.
8
1.14
UNLV
6
1.11
Memphis
8
1.09
Florida
7
0.95
Purdue
10
0.94
Murray St.
6
0.92
Notre Dame
7
0.90
Texas
11
0.90
Temple
5
0.84
Alabama
9
0.84
Belmont
14
0.81
Cincinnati
6
0.79
NC State
11
0.78
Gonzaga
7
0.75
Iowa St.
8
0.71
Virginia
10
0.71
Creighton
8
0.69
Xavier
10
0.67
California
12
0.67
St. Louis
9
0.66
San Diego St.
6
0.64
Connecticut
9
0.56
West Virginia
10
0.55
Colorado St.
11
0.54
St. Mary's
7
0.53
Long Beach St.
12
0.52
St. Bonaventure
14
0.50
Colorado
11
0.46
Harvard
12
0.46
South Dakota St.
14
0.44
Ohio
13
0.44
Davidson
13
0.39
Southern Miss
9
0.35
- In case it wasn’t clear how terrible the draw is for Memphis and St. Louis. Memphis has the 9th best Pomeroy ranking, but is 22nd in expected wins. St. Louis had the 15th best Pomeroy ranking, but is 39th in expected wins.
- Southern Miss has some of the worst margin-of-victory stats in the field. Don’t pick them to upset Kansas St.
And here is the last of the list:
Team
Seed
EW
Lehigh
15
0.34
VCU
12
0.32
New Mexico St.
13
0.29
BYU
14
0.28
Iona
14
0.23
South Florida
12
0.21
Montana
13
0.17
NC Asheville
16
0.12
Detroit
15
0.11
Lamar
16
0.09
Loyola MD
15
0.06
Vermont
16
0.05
Norfolk St.
15
0.04
Long Island
16
0.04
Western Kentucky
16
0.02
Miss. Valley St.
16
0.00
Parting Thoughts
- Seth Davis said it well at the end of the selection special, the NCAA committee sent a message that non-conference strength-of-schedule matters. That’s why Iona got in ahead of Drexel. And that’s why Missouri was not a #1 seed. A lot of people will argue with that message. What does non-conference strength-of-schedule have to do with evaluating the quality of a team? Isn’t the goal to pick the best teams? But I’ve been watching this show for 20 years, and the committee has always had this emphasis. They want to incentivize teams to play big games early in the season, and whether it is an explicit criteria or not, it is a criteria.
- I still can’t believe Kevin Harlan weaved in a comment about Peyton Manning during the Arizona vs Colorado Pac-12 final. (Yes, Manning probably won’t be choosing between Denver and Arizona based on the outcome of that game.)
- Finally, only Bob Knight could manage to eat an ice cream cone while calling a college basketball game.
As Draymond Green locked up the Big Ten POY award and Kansas battled Missouri for a likely No. 1 seed, Saturday afternoon encapsulated everything that is great about the NCAA regular season.
Many have called this a down year for college basketball and though that argument can be made about elite teams, there are still plenty of reasons why it's a fallacy.
On why Indiana was going in the right direction before their upset of Kentucky, how the Xavier/Cincinnati brawl could have been prevented, Draymond Green, USC, Notre Dame and more.